I often see working in IT that in many businesses companies seem to set people up to fail.

Why do I say this? I see people being expected to work with equipment that doesn’t have the resources to do the job. The machines repeatedly crash and once I bought more RAM the crashing stopped. The ram cost $30 and the lost time and wages was far more than that. In every job I have seen people being asked to work with machines that could not do the job they were told to do. They didn’t want to ask for the tools they needed.

I recognize this problem and have always approached decisions makers when it is time to buy a new machine. Often this has been a difficult conversation since companies rarely want to spend money. However when people leave because they can’t do their job effectively, that has a cost as well. Ultimately healthy organizations want to keep their employees happy.

Looking back in my career there were jobs that I have held that management didn’t seem to care if I succeeded or failed. I myself have faced problems with resources. I was hired at one company and not given a computer. I was left on my own to find a computer to use, and they didn’t have extra computers laying around. Looking back I should have seen that as a red flag and left, but I just took it as another challenge to be solved. Ultimately I pieced together a computer but it was slow and didn’t do the job it needed to do.

If a company doesn’t give you the resources you need to succeed you should ask and then find another company to work for. Under resourced companies are often close to failure. I have seen this in companies that I have worked for that failed in the past. They don’t invest and the quality of the work and interactions with your coworkers will be poor.

See also  Descartes ideas were really from a woman

I was told once in a company that failed by a manager that “a poor workman complains about his tools.”. I disagree. You can’t do a good job with poor tools.