Facebook has really accomplished something hasn’t it? It took MySpace’s spot and looks like it might even muscle out Google/Microsoft as well. I don’t know if that is a helpful thing.
Janrain, a user management platform that enables third party sign-in with 18 different providers, including Facebook, Google, and Twitter; is releasing its Q1 2011 report today. Janrain’s report analyzes data from networks for social login and social sharing across the 350,000 websites worldwide that use Janrain sign-in product, Engage. For the first time in a year, Facebook has surpassed Google as the consumer preference for signing into Interne … Read More
I’m no Facebook defender but it seems that people like variety more than anything else. Perhaps too many clone applications like Farmville have bored people so they are starting to look elsewhere.
Over the last year I have been saying that it feels as though Facebook has jumped the shark. I know the enrollment numbers to continue to climb, and they have over 650 million users world-wide, but it seems like most of the people I know use it far less than they did a year ago. The white-hot excitement about the social networking site seems to be, well… flat. I thought it was just me, but the folks over at Ars Technica have a poll running that … Read More
I am going to use this tool next. What a nice way to help curate the people who are actually going to benefit from you. On Twitter you get lots of followers who don’t have the best motivation. For example, sometimes you get spam/porn related people who you may not want.
If you have a lot of people who you follow on Twitter, it can get pretty confusing. ManageFlitter is a simple tool that helps you figure out who to follow, and who you should get rid of. ManageFlitter also tells you: who’s following you that you don’t follow back people you follow and don’t follow you back persons that tweets a lot who barely tweets inactive accounts To start, simply visit ManageFlitter, and you’ll be able to sign up with your Tw … Read More
I responded to a post here of someone who said this:
I don’t think the quote ” Live within your means.” applies to him. He is living way below his means which is amazing. While some a lot of people, on the other hand, is living beyond what they can afford. It is a sad truth. I hope we could all take a lesson or two on Mark Zuckerberg’s modest living. It is an inspiration.
My response:
Hello,
You might not know this but Mr. Jobs has been trying to get rid of that house for years and has been appealing the board of his community to remove it. They felt it was a historic landmark. The plans for Mr. Jobs are detailed at Gizmodo here. http://gizmodo.com/5649909/the-house-that-steve-jobs-will-build
It is as humble as Mr. Zuckerbergs home. In fact, more so because of his wife and kids.
Also while I am not defending the large homes of the wealthy, there is a practical element of having those homes. They have significant reason to need better security than the average joe, and those homes provide that. The world would be a poor place without people who risk things and take chances. While materialism does have some unhelpful consequences, I would rather see them spend it on this than just hoard it and not provide tax revenues and jobs.
If modest living appeals to you, look at monks/spiritual people who have a literal handful of possessions. Look at the poor of society who have to do without not by choice, but by the circumstances of their lives. Look at the 2 billion people in the world who live on less then $2 a day. Wealth doesn’t make our lives better, it just distracts us from the good things that it sometimes obscures.
I think its reasonable for the stability of Mr. Jobs children (everyones children) that he owns a house. In addition, famous peoples homes are probably one of the only places they can relax and not worry about invasion of privacy. It doesn’t seem so unreasonable that they have these places, even if they are more about ego than necessitity.