Is Microsoft Office 2016 worth it?

First look: Microsoft Office 2016 for Mac doesn’t feel like an afterthought | Macworld. This is a pretty good review of what it is like. If you ever have to use Outlook in an office setting you probably welcome that it looks and acts like its windows counterpart. It still doesn’t have full feature parity with Windows, but they are doing better.

First look: Microsoft Office 2016 for Mac doesn't feel like an afterthought | MacworldIt is really unacceptable that Microsoft has taken so long to standardize their interface between Windows and Mac. Too many users have to use a Windows computer at work, and prefer a Mac at home. For them to offer Mac users a second class experience for so long, that is something that was customer hostile. For this reason, I can’t suggest that you buy or support Microsoft on this program. If you want exchange functionality I would suggest Fastmail which has an iOS app and the ability to sync contacts and calender easily. It can also hold files much like Gmail’s Google Drive.

Is this a worthwhile upgrade if you need it? Sure, it works for the most part. I was able to set up an Exchange account. I wouldn’t personally buy it. I think that 2016 is ugly, and 2011 looks nicer. I have worked with the PC version of office and the interface is boring and basic. I don’t think it helps anyone. It is a return to the early days like WordPerfect where the style is minimal and they try to avoid icons. Icons are crucial for casual computer users. There should be an option in programs to allow the different interfaces for programs. For example, the upgrade to Ribbon was so hard for most people. When corporations randomly change interfaces and require users to relearn their program that is the biggest problem that people don’t upgrade. People don’t have infinite time/ability to spend learning. Is it so hard to consider the customer first?

A tale of 10 emails

I have been fortunate to have email for a long time. Since the late 90’s in fact. I thought it might be interesting to compare my email providers since I have just recently switched to a new email provider.

  1. Pine. This was a client I used during school that was just text and very ugly. However it was so cool because you could have friendships with people all around the world! I had many friendships with people all over the world, but unfortunately in those days email wasn’t very reliable so I lost track of them. Well it was a nice start to being international.
  2. Netscape email. Netscape was so beautiful compared to what Pine looked like. It had some neat features and was so easy to use. I spent years with Netscape.
  3. Eudora/Quarterdeck/Outlook Express. It’s true for those nerds out there that Quarterdeck was a chat client, but what a chat client it was! It was amazing in its time. Quarterdeck made some amazing software in the day. Eudora was cool and Outlook Express was awful. I was so glad to move to the next big thing.
  4. iTools then .Mac mail. These were apples failed attempts at email. This was later replaced by iCloud which was still a failure. I tried all of these services and stayed with them way past the point I should have. I kept hoping and Apple kept promising it would get better. It never did. Everything that could go wrong did with these services. Lost email, slowness, crashes, so on. I will never use any Mac email service again based on my experience for these 5 years.
  5. Web email like yahoo/gmail/other smaller providers. This was interesting but ultimately unsatisfying. Gmail always had irritating ads, and the loss of privacy just wasn’t worth it being free. My last email provider was Gmail, but I have grown tired of their privacy attitude and their sense of “don’t be evil” just isn’t factually true anymore. I am in the process of deleting my google account and never plan on doing business with them again.
  6. Exchange providers from Rackspace/Inmotion/other web hosting companies. Rackspace was fantastic and incredible for email. Even when gmail when down, Rackspace kept on working. They were the only ones with a true 100% uptime that I experienced with email. Inmotion also had great email but I didn’t use it very much since I was using gmail when I was a customer. Other web hosting companies aren’t worth mentioning since their reliability was unremarkable or bad.
  7. For testing purposes I tried Zoho, Protonmail, GMX and a bunch of other smaller providers. To me, they all had critical flaws. Zoho is ugly and its interface is overwhelming. I couldn’t suggest it to the average person. Protonmail had great privacy but it was ugly and overly complicated and not going to be worth its limitations which are currently 500 message limit a month for free. GMX was interesting, but ugly and I didn’t like the price structure.
  8. Using email from whatever client I was working for. Most clients want me on their email system so that I am easy to get ahold of for them. Often when you help people on projects they may want to send you a large file and being on their email system means that can send you incredibly large attachments and not worry about most email providers 10MB limit. So in this way I tried out many different exchange environments in companies and was mostly unimpressed. Most exchange environments tended to have performance issues especially on Monday morning, or mornings while people worked. I would not put my personal email on a clients system, so this wasn’t a good choice for me for personal use.
  9. Setting up a mail server and running it myself. No way. I am not that interested in email that I would take on this huge task for one person. In addition it doesn’t make financial sense in that I will never be an exchange only administrator and don’t want to commit my time to mastering this software. I have been an exchange administrator in the past, but it was one duty among many others and not my sole responsibility.
  10. Using an email address built into a social platform like Facebook. I am never going to join Facebook, so I wouldn’t do that just for email. LinkedIn can sync your email provider to their service, and then you send from LinkedIn via your outside email provider. This isn’t any good to me. They should have a native built-in email service that doesn’t require an outside email provider. Although I am not sure that I trust them with my personal information.

So what did I end up choosing? FastMail. It had an iOS client, it was $10 a year for the basic version-I am a light email user, it is beautifully done, it has features without being overwhelming, and it is most like Gmail for people who don’t like Gmail. I can feel good about recommending this to a non-technical person, and assist them if they can’t handle it. It was easy to import my information from gmail, and has some nice tools to import contacts, emails, calendars from many programs. They are not paying me, but so far it seems the best Gmail alternative.