Water bottle that is 100% degradable

Water bottle that is 100% degradableSo using Algae this water bottle totally degrades.

I wonder if this is the next generation of bottles for natural companies like Naked?

What is cool about this is that it was developed relatively cheaply by an individual. You really are forced to wonder if people with no funding can find solutions like this, why can’t big business?

Of course there may not be a financial incentive, but one day it will no longer be a choice. Business force holding onto the past as much as possible, and discourage new and innovative methods.

For example, all of the bottle manufactures could have come up with this concept. Maybe they already have plans for a bottle that breaks down. Many companies exist because they get paid by their supplies to use their supplies. Like the government pays farmers to not grow things, companies pay other companies to not use other products.

Maybe what needs to be done to help move things in a more environmental direction is to not allow companies that produce earth destroying materials to make a profit. Any profit they make has to be used to research and development and the other half is to clean up the mess already made with their product. Just like BP had to clean up their mess and pay a fine, there has to be a both a carrot and stick approach with social change.

The guy who developed this should be famous. Anyone who is creative and comes up with innovative ways should be regarded for what they are, a powerful and helpful person. Perhaps this won’t be the ultimate solution, but it is a step in the right direction. At the very least it might be used for animal packaging, where they can just throw in the bottles or packaging and let the animals eat the algae as well.

What does the future hold? Certainly more of this kind of thinking I hope.


Related Post

John Oliver encryption video

John Oliver encryption video. This is a brilliant argument and video from John Oliver. It does have some errors but it provides thoughtful analysis of the Apple encryption debate.

Certainly there is not an easy answer to this debate. If there were then someone would have proposed a solution. When the system is based on no access, giving access is of course problematic. It is unfortunate that some crimes may never be learned through the iPhone but perhaps they will get solved in some other way.

If encryption were controlled and were essentially bio-metric that would be a method around this problem. If for example, our eye print or fingerprint plus something else could be used then this would be a dead debate. I can’t imagine what else that thing could be. Maybe a relaxed brain wave pattern? Like how your brain looks when you think of someone you love for example? That should be unique and reproduce-able. Making a device that is easy for people of all skills levels and intelligence is quite a challenge. It is really remarkable that there isn’t more hacking and crime with the current system.

I guess what bothers me most in this entire debate is the polarization of both sides. Both sides are guilty of not completely truthful statements. The government for example says that Apple could destroy the code once it was used, which isn’t going to happen. Apple says that giving access is opening a Pandoras box. Certainly true, but there has to be a way to address the criminal element in any technology as well. Apple should come up with way to detect illegal use and automatically shut it down. Apple and other businesses profit from criminal use, and this should not be allowed.

Why can I say that? It is common for gangs and other organizations to steal and resell iPhones/apple equipment overseas. The current system allows them to do this. When my own iPhone was stolen I have no doubt that it ended up overseas. It is simple greed that kept the wireless carrier and Apple from preventing that. They could have easily made a system when a phone is taken out of the country from an account that has never traveled before. For those people who do travel with their phone a simple notification and password check would allow them to use it overseas. This is not rocket science, but Apple/Wireless carriers would rather sell a new phone then protect owners who purchase a phone.

Too many times business say they are not in the business of enforcing the law. They make it an excuse even if they have laws regulating them. They blame rogue workers, when it is the system that contributes to this. There is no reason why criminals can’t be identified in a way that preserves peoples rights and our privacy. Apple may not be responsible for crime, but they are responsible for setting up a system that profits from it.

Related Post